Concept

R-multiple Framework

R-multiple Framework is a Risk, Sizing & Exits concept. The Library holds 4 implementations, each one a working definition you can pull into Quant.

Top R-multiple Framework indicators

4 total

What is the R-multiple Framework?

The R-multiple framework expresses every trade outcome as a multiple of its initial risk. R is the amount put at risk at entry: the distance from entry to stop, times position size. A trade stopped for its full risk is -1R; a trade that returns twice what it risked is +2R. Popularized by Van Tharp, the convention turns a ledger of dollar results across different instruments, sizes, and account balances into a single comparable distribution of R-multiples.

That normalization is the point. Expectancy becomes the average R per trade, a function of win rate and the relative size of winners and losers in R terms. Paired with fixed fractional sizing, where every trade risks the same fraction of equity, 1R maps to a known slice of the account, so losing streaks can be reasoned about in trade counts instead of dollars. The framework stays honest only if R is recorded from the original stop: widening a stop mid-trade quietly redefines what -1R was supposed to mean.

How traders use it

  • For journaling: every closed trade is logged as an R-multiple, so expectancy and the shape of the outcome distribution can be tracked without the noise of varying position sizes and instruments.
  • For pre-trade geometry: targets are quoted in R against a 1R stop, making reward-to-risk explicit before entry; see the profit target taxonomy for how those objectives get placed.
  • For comparing systems: strategies on different markets or account sizes can be ranked on average R, R distribution, and worst R streaks, because the unit already accounts for what was risked.

More R-multiple Framework implementations

Related concepts · Trade & account analytics

Concept family

Risk, Sizing & Exits

37 concepts mapped · 19 in the Library

R-multiple Framework FAQ

What does 2R mean in trading?

A 2R result means the trade made twice its initial risk. If entry-to-stop distance times size put $100 on the line, a 2R win returned $200. R is fixed by the original stop at entry, so every outcome, +2R, -1R, -0.4R, describes the result relative to what the trade was designed to lose at most.

Is a higher R-multiple target always better?

No. More distant targets raise the average winner in R but usually fill less often, and expectancy depends on both. A 3R target that rarely completes can underperform a 1.5R target that completes regularly. The framework does not pick the right mix; it makes the trade-off measurable in your own records so the choice stops being a guess.

Build R-multiple Framework your way.

Quant writes, tests, and refines it with you — then it runs on LuxAlgo charting or ports to TradingView.