Concept
Consequent Encroachment
Consequent Encroachment, also known as CE, FVG midpoint, is a Smart Money Concepts / ICT concept. The Library holds 1 implementations, each one a working definition you can pull into Quant.
Top Consequent Encroachment indicators
1 total
What is Consequent Encroachment?
Consequent encroachment (usually just CE) is the midpoint of a fair value gap: the 50% line between the gap's boundaries. ICT vocabulary applies the same term to the midpoint of a candle wick, which the methodology reads as a small single-candle inefficiency of its own. In both cases CE turns a zone into something more precise: an exact middle against which reactions can be judged.
The midpoint matters because it splits the imbalance into its own premium and discount halves; a return that reaches CE has rebalanced half the inefficiency. Many FVG playbooks anchor rules to that line: entries at it, invalidation through it, respected-versus-disrespected reads around it. Reaction at CE is a tendency the methodology claims and builds on, not a guarantee — plenty of gaps trade straight through their midpoint without pausing.
How traders use it
- As an entry refinement inside a gap, rather than bidding the near edge, wait for price to reach CE and reject there. The trade-off is explicit: tighter entries and smaller stops on the fills you get, in exchange for missing the gaps that turn before the midpoint.
- As a validity line: a common rule-set treats a gap as respected while closes hold on the near side of CE, and as weakened once price closes through it, shifting expectation toward a full fill; FVG behavior rules collects these conventions.
- As a wick-based level: the midpoint of a prominent wick is watched the same way, as a reaction level or partial-fill target, on the reading that a long wick is an inefficiency the market may only half-revisit.
Related concepts · Imbalance taxonomy
Concept family
Smart Money Concepts / ICT
54 concepts mapped · 50 in the Library
Consequent Encroachment FAQ
Is consequent encroachment just the 50% level of a fair value gap?
Yes. Consequent encroachment is ICT's name for the exact midpoint of a fair value gap, and the same term is applied to the midpoint of a candle wick, which the methodology treats as a small imbalance in its own right. Using "CE" rather than "the fifty" keeps the vocabulary consistent across gaps, wicks, and the rules built on them.
Does a fair value gap have to fill to consequent encroachment?
No. Some gaps reject at their edge without reaching the midpoint, some trade to CE and hold there, and others fill completely, or are never revisited at all. Many models treat a touch of CE as sufficient rebalance for the gap to stay usable, but that is a convention inside the methodology. Plan around fills as scenarios, not certainties.
Build Consequent Encroachment your way.
Quant writes, tests, and refines it with you — then it runs on LuxAlgo charting or ports to TradingView.
