Concept
Probability Cones
Probability Cones are Statistics concepts. The Library holds 5 implementations, each one a working definition you can pull into Quant.
Top Probability Cones indicators
5 total
What are Probability Cones?
Probability cones are forward-projected envelopes, anchored at the current price, an entry, or an event, that show where price is statistically expected to remain at chosen confidence levels. The width scales with a volatility input, either realized volatility from recent history or implied volatility from options, and grows with the square root of elapsed time, because under independent returns the variance of the cumulative move accumulates linearly with time.
Confidence labels come from a distributional assumption. Under a normal approximation, an envelope of one standard deviation covers roughly 68 percent of outcomes and two standard deviations roughly 95 percent; cones can also be built empirically as percentile bands over Monte Carlo price paths. Real returns are fatter-tailed than normal, so actual breach rates run higher than the labels suggest, and a cone edge is a statistical boundary, not support or resistance.
How traders use it
- As an expected-move frame for options horizons: comparing a target against the cone implied by option pricing shows whether the trade needs an outsized move by the market's own estimate.
- As a realism check on stops and targets: a target sitting outside the cone for the trade's intended horizon is, under the model, a low-probability outcome, which argues for resizing the trade or allowing more time.
- As post-entry context: price hugging or escaping the cone flags a move that is large relative to the volatility regime the cone assumed, often a prompt to reassess the position.
More Probability Cones implementations
Related concepts · Simulation
Concept family
Statistics
45 concepts mapped · 37 in the Library
Probability Cones FAQ
What does a 95 percent probability cone actually mean?
It means that under the model's assumptions (the chosen volatility, roughly normal returns, no regime change) about 95 percent of outcomes stay inside the envelope through the horizon. It is a statement about the model, not a promise from the market: fat tails and volatility shifts push real breach rates above the label, and touching the edge is not a trade signal by itself.
Should probability cones use implied or historical volatility?
They answer different questions. Implied volatility embeds the market's forward-looking pricing, including known events, so options traders usually prefer it for horizons to expiry. Historical volatility describes the recent past and works on anything without an options market. Neither is correct by default; when the two disagree sharply, that gap itself is information about priced-in event risk.
Build Probability Cones your way.
Quant writes, tests, and refines it with you — then it runs on LuxAlgo charting or ports to TradingView.


